Gary Gregory
2014-09-14 14:51:35 UTC
Seeing the last commit go by for a builder on the console appender made me
wonder if we really want this pattern considering the size cost in extra
code. So this is just a sanity check that we are not making this fancier
than it needs to be considering... what? That this would only be used for
programmatic configuration by tests and other apps. Are the builders also
used by the configuration code?
Gary
wonder if we really want this pattern considering the size cost in extra
code. So this is just a sanity check that we are not making this fancier
than it needs to be considering... what? That this would only be used for
programmatic configuration by tests and other apps. Are the builders also
used by the configuration code?
Gary
--
E-Mail: ***@gmail.com | ***@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
E-Mail: ***@gmail.com | ***@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory